Stumbling out of the Gate
An historic start for the NBA’s most storied franchise, as this year’s version of the Boston Celtics goes 0-3 for the fourth time in the past 40 years. In 2006 the slow start led to a grand total of 27 wins by the season’s end (it has been argued that the team milked Pierce’s injury at the end of the season to get the coveted number one pick to potentially select Kevin Durant) leading to a complete facelift and the acquisitions of Ray Allen then Kevin Garnett. In 1994 the 0-3 start led the Celts to finish with 35 wins and a grand prize of being dominated in the first round of the playoffs by Shaquille O’Neal and the Orlando Magic. The next season led to the firing of Chris Ford and M.L. Carr hiring himself (yeah, that worked out well) and a move from The Garden to the Fleet Center, which they didn’t have much of a choice about either way. In 1977 the Celtics slow start came to a close with a total of 32 wins and the ability to draft Larry Bird with the 6th overall selection.
The slow starts in franchise history have not ended well for the Celtics. Two complete overhauls and one season of playoff embarrassment amid a 22 year championship lull that Boston fans would rather purge from their memory regarding their hallowed basketball team.
Optimistically, if this team makes the playoffs as currently constituted and has a season similar to that of the 1994-1995 Celtics, they will finish with 28 or 29 wins.
Is that really what fans have to look foward to with this team however? Does that past necessarily translate to the present and future?
I’ve never personally believed that the distant past effects the present, due to the simple fact that it is a completely different team, it doesn’t matter what former players did. Yet, realistically this Celtics team could easily hover around a .500 record when entering the playoffs, and is that really what fans want?
With an average age of just over 30 for players averaging ten or more minutes played, the Celtics seem to be at a disadvantage. However, when looking at the shortened season of 1999, both the Knicks and Spurs average age was 30 for players with similar criteria. The Knicks leaned heavily on 36 year old Patrick Ewing in the playoffs, as they finished 3 games over .500 and made the NBA Finals as the 8th seed. Ewing played in just 38 games during the regular season, but led the team in minutes played per game.
The biggest difference between the Knicks of 1999 and the current Celtics, however, is the Celtics average age of their stars. After Ewing, the next six players in average minutes per game were between the age of 24 and 29. For the Celts only Rajon Rondo and Brandon Bass are under 31 and that doesn’t include Paul Pierce who has yet to play this season.
Optimism is becoming increasingly more difficult to rationalize when addressing the potential of this Celtics team. The roster lacks depth and youth. By ridding itself of immature players such as Glen Davis (which I agreed with letting go) and Delonte West (whom I thought should have been the first re-signed) it sacrificed youth. Keyon Dooling and Marquis Daniels are two of the first players off of Boston’s bench and both are 31 years old.
Will the addition of Pierce help this Celtics squad? Of course, but his absence is certainly not the sole reason the Celtics are off to such a slow start.
For those who are searching for something to be positive about, try to ignore the game in New Orleans and focus on the first two of the season. With Rondo being the only Celtic player who realized the lockout was over in the first half, he carried the Celtics from a 17-point deficit to a 10-point lead in the 4th quarter before falling to the Knicks 106-104 in the most exciting game the league could have asked for to open the season. The Celts followed that performance with a 20-point deficit cut down to 3 with 1:22 left to play in Miami only to fall to the Heat 115-107.
Two games where Rondo looked as though he is beginning to step up and become more of a leader, leading his team back from huge holes against two very good teams.
That being said, the Celtics are allowing too many points, an average of 106 in their first three games, to the point where they had no choice but to imploy a zone defense against the Miami Heat (which worked well in the 4th). This Celtics squad had prided itself in man-to-man help defense, allowing minimal points to their opponents and thus far we have not seen that team.
I cannot honestly remember the last time I saw the Celtics throw a 2-3 zone on the floor, prior to the game Tuesday night against the Heat.
Boston cannot continue to dig itself out of holes. This style of play will catch up with them and it was evident when they lost to the lowly Hornets without budding star Eric Gordon.
Rondo has been exciting to watch, and to be honest the first two games had some exciting basketball, but this team is squaring off with history and the battle will inevitably come to a disappointing end. The question is will it be an end full of bright future like the ’06 and ’77 starts or are we in the midst of a stretch that should be stricken from the history books like ’94?
Only time will tell and Danny Ainge has a tough job ahead of him.
Sean Sendall – follow me on Twitter










